As a practical matter, though, how do you begin revision? Here are my suggestions:
- Re-read a draft, set it aside. and then fastwrite for as long as you can about what you noticed about the piece, what you're thinking now about it, what you might be trying to say but not quite saying. Explore what you think is working and what might need work. Think through writing about what you've done in a draft and what you might do.
- Attack it physically. Sometimes we can't seem to escape the pull of a first draft enough to see it freshly. One solution is to literally take it apart so it doesn't look like the thing you started with. This is especially useful for research essays. For how to do this, see " Exercise 5.3: Cut and Paste Revision" on p. 196 of Curious Researcher.
- Start with the most important thing: What is the draft trying to say? What is the SOFT? To re-orient yourself to this, answer this question in writing: What do I understand now about this topic that I didn't fully appreciate when I first starting writing about it? Then tell yourself the story of how your thinking evolved from the beginning. Skip a line, and answer the question you started with again. Write this on a notecard and pin it above your desk. Now go through your draft and ask yourself, "Does the information in each paragraph move the readers towards understanding what I'm trying to say on that notecsard?"
- Multiple leads. We've done this before as a class exercise. But I can't overstate how powerful different beginnings can be in revision. Work towards finding a place to begin that establishes the purpose of your essay: the question, dilemma, problem, or idea that you're interested in.
I'll talk more with everybody in conference next week about their specific questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment